Redfox v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ALASKA WYATT N. REDFOX,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-cv-00005-SLG-MMS

BRANDON JONES, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

At Docket 27, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this action back to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue.

Upon review, the Court determines that Mr. Redfox’s incarcerated and indigent status has not changed. And the Court finds that at least Mr. Redfox’s individual claims are not frivolous. Therefore, the district court finds that in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002).

DATED this 18th day of October, 2021, at Anchorage, Alaska.

/s/ Sharon L. Gleason UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE