Askew v. State
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rector v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ex Parte Baldwin (Ala. 1984)
- Baldwin v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
- Brown v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1976)
- Jones v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1973)
- Lambert v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1972)
- Parsons v. State (Ala. 1948)
- Shiver v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Moore v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hammock v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The ruling on the defendant’s motion to quash the indictment cannot be reviewed, as the record does not set out the motion or otherwise disclose the grounds of it. — McQueen v. State, 138 Ala. 63, 65 South. 39; Lacey v. State, 154 Ala. 65, 45 South. 680.
The court was not in error in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment. That motion undertook to present objections to the indictment on grounds going to the formation of the grand jury which found it. This is permitted to be done only by plea in abatement. — Section 23, Jury Law (Acts Special Session 1909, p. 315) ; Thornton v. State, 4 Ala. App. 205, 59 South. 234.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.