Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Alabama Courts of Civil and Criminal Appeals /

1913

347 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1913.

  • Bohanan v. Darden 60 So. 955, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Boswell v. State 61 So. 188, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Birmingham Sand & Brick Co. 64 So. 202, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hill v. State 64 So. 163, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Brown v. State 64 So. 170, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Doty v. State 64 So. 170, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hinktom v. State 64 So. 193, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Young v. State 64 So. 171, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Garner v. State 64 So. 183, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Wright v. State 64 So. 173, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Wheeler v. Krohn, Fechheimer & Co. 64 So. 179, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. Knight 64 So. 196, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Elliott v. Palmer 64 So. 182, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Alabama Northern Railroad v. Methvin 64 So. 175, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Worthington v. Long 64 So. 174, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Murphy v. Coleman 64 So. 185, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Taylor 64 So. 187, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sanders 64 So. 190, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. McLeod 64 So. 193, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Mathis 64 So. 197, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Empire Coal Co. v. Gravlee 64 So. 207, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Howell v. State 64 So. 522, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Hale v. State 64 So. 530, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Freeman v. State 64 So. 514, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Golden v. State 64 So. 517, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Barnett v. United Bros. of F. & S. of M. T. 64 So. 518, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Courson 65 So. 698, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Ramey v. State 64 So. 168, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • State v. Dodd 64 So. 169, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Thomas v. State 64 So. 192, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Haas Bros. v. Craft 64 So. 163, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Harrison v. Birmingham Water Works Co. 64 So. 164, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Ewton v. McCracken 64 So. 177, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Charlie's Transfer Co. v. Leedy & Co. 64 So. 205, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Lewis v. State 64 So. 537, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Buchanan v. State 65 So. 205, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Orr v. Boockholdt 65 So. 430, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Winton v. Irwin 64 So. 525, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Smith v. Allen 63 So. 770, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Howard v. State 63 So. 753, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Williams v. Lay 63 So. 792, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Roy v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad 63 So. 772, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Page v. Haas Bros. Packing Co. 63 So. 691, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Duffin v. Summerville 63 So. 816, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • State v. Thomas 63 So. 688, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Ashmon v. State 63 So. 754, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Foshee v. State 63 So. 753, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Cammack v. Lavender 63 So. 686, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Williams v. State 63 So. 1031, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
  • Mathis v. State 63 So. 737, (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑