1914
274 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1914.
- Glover v. State 66 So. 877, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hicks v. State 66 So. 873, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ellis v. State 66 So. 913, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Harris v. State 66 So. 876, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Brown v. State 66 So. 829, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Rector v. State 66 So. 857, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ellison v. District Grand Lodge No. 23 66 So. 872, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ragsdale v. State 67 So. 783, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- James v. State 67 So. 773, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ware v. State 67 So. 763, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Black v. State 67 So. 770, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Brannon v. State 67 So. 634, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ex parte Lane 67 So. 727, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- King v. Gibbs 67 So. 757, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Lane v. City of Tuscaloosa 67 So. 778, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Brown v. City of Tuscaloosa 67 So. 780, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Roe v. City of Tuscaloosa 67 So. 845, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Spigener v. State 66 So. 986, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Jackson v. State 66 So. 877, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Franklin v. State 66 So. 875, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Webb v. State 66 So. 870, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Mazett v. State 66 So. 871, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Johnson v. Odom 66 So. 853, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Blalack v. Blacksher 66 So. 863, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- American Bonding Co. v. New York & Mexican Whiting Co. 66 So. 847, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Dawson 66 So. 905, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hall v. State 67 So. 739, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Spenny 67 So. 740, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- McEntire v. Paffe 67 So. 713, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Askew v. State 66 So. 852, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Johnson v. State 66 So. 875, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hood v. Com. Germania T. & S. Bank of New Orleans 67 So. 721, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Albany Warehouse Co. v. F. B. Fisk Cotton Co. 67 So. 728, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Brown v. Pittsburg Life & Trust Co. 12 Ala. App. 661, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hughes v. State 66 So. 844, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Owens v. State 66 So. 852, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Upshaw v. State 66 So. 821, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- McCoy v. Prince 66 So. 950, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Gunter 66 So. 844, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Landrum & Co. v. Wright 66 So. 892, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Potter v. Tucker 66 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hilley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. 66 So. 883, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Hockensmith v. Winton 66 So. 954, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Gunter 11 Ala. App. 679, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Postal Telegraph-C. Co. v. Nail 66 So. 903, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Tate v. Cody-Henderson Co. 66 So. 837, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Padgett v. Gulfport Fertilizer Co. 66 So. 866, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Park-Robertson Hardware Co. v. Copeland 66 So. 880, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Southern Wesco Supply Co. v. Hammond 66 So. 941, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louissell 66 So. 839, (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)