Banks v. State
Banks v. State
11 Ala. App. 176; 65 So. 667; 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
Banks v. State
Opinion of the Court
It was permissible for the jury to find from the evidence as to the language used by the defendant to Mrs. Russell and the circumstances of its use that it was insulting, within the meaning of section 6217 of the Code. — Turney v. State, 168 Ala. 128, 52 South. 910; Carter v. State, 107 Ala. 146, 18 South. 232; Wiley v. State, 65 South. 204. It follows that the inquiry as to whether what the defendant said bad such an import was properly submitted to the jury, and that the charges requested by him were well refused.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.