1915
278 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1915.
- Carrol Mercantile Co. v. Folmar 70 So. 985, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Wilson v. Owens Horse & Mule Co. 70 So. 956, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Stovall v. Hamilton 71 So. 63, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Wright v. State 67 So. 798, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Bryant v. State 70 So. 961, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- American Workmen v. James 70 So. 976, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Knights of Modern Macabees v. Gillespie 71 So. 67, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Stedham v. Robertson 71 So. 62, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Stadt v. City of Birmingham 14 Ala. App. 667, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Talley v. State 68 So. 567, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Noble v. State 70 So. 187, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Carroll 70 So. 984, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Farell 70 So. 986, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Hooper v. Herring 70 So. 308, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- American Nat. Insurance v. Moore 70 So. 190, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Steverson v. Agee & Co. 70 So. 298, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Torpy 70 So. 198, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Brown & Co. v. Matthews 70 So. 287, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Broadwell v. Imms 70 So. 294, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- McLaughlin v. Hardwick 70 So. 305, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Hill v. Condon 70 So. 208, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Cox Hat Co. v. Adams 70 So. 203, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- McRight v. Farned 70 So. 297, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Myers 70 So. 186, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Hart v. Jones 70 So. 206, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Allen v. Camp 70 So. 290, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Pilgrim 70 So. 301, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Parker-Blake Co. v. Ladd 70 So. 188, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Huntsville Grocery Co. v. Johnson 69 So. 967, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Weinstein v. Citizens Bank 69 So. 972, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Frazier 69 So. 969, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hawkins 70 So. 12, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Edwards 70 So. 285, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Wise v. Johnson 69 So. 986, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Town of Dadeville v. Wynn 70 So. 197, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Bowdon Lime Works v. Moss 70 So. 292, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Cornelius v. Lowery 70 So. 305, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Enzor v. Rushton 69 So. 909, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Smith 69 So. 910, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- City of Montgomery v. Stephens 69 So. 970, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Bartlett v. Chaviers 69 So. 975, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Dixie Fertilizer Co. v. Teasley 69 So. 988, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Laney 69 So. 993, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Birmingham Candy Co. v. Shepherd 70 So. 193, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Dothan Grocery Co. v. White Bros. 69 So. 992, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Sibley v. Barclay 70 So. 201, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Porter & Co. v. Godfrey 70 So. 204, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Banks v. State 69 So. 242, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Moton v. State 69 So. 235, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Ingram v. State 69 So. 976, (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)