This is a companion case to Hugh Rogers v. State, infra, 73 South. 994, disposed of January 30, 1917. The undisputed evidence shows that the defendant aided and abetted Rogers in procuring an unlawful sale of prohibited liquors, and that he aided in transporting the liquors to the state’s witness Crump.

The case is governed by the principles declared in Bridgeforth v. State, infra, 74 South. 402, and Rogers v. State, supra, and authorities there cited.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.