The court did not commit error in its various rulings on the evidence. But it having been testified by some of the witnesses that the defendant was seven-eighths Indian, the solicitor, in his closing argument, said:

“Did you ever hear how an Indian liked liquor? A negro’s appetite for liquor is not a circumstance to it.”

This remark was improper, was not sustained by the evidence, and should have been excluded in defendant’s motion. Sykes v. State, 151 Ala. 80, 44 South. 398; Roden v. State, 3 Ala. App. 202, 58 South. 72.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

•Reversed and remanded.