Harrell v. Hooks

Alabama Court of Appeals
Harrell v. Hooks, 80 So. 145 (1918)
16 Ala. App. 571; 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 247
Brioken

Harrell v. Hooks

Opinion of the Court

BRIOKEN, J.

On a previous day at the last term of this court, in response to a motion of appellee, the bill of exceptions in this case was stricken. All errors assigned, having reference to matters to be shown by the bill of exceptions, are concluded.

Several errors are assigned on the record, as to rulings on demurrers to pleas; but in view of the fact that there is no bill of exceptions, and assuming, without so deciding, that the court did err in the particulars named, it is not made to appear that the error was prejudicial to appellant. This is necessary under Supreme Court rule 45 (175" Ala. xxi, 61 South, ix).

Injury is no longer presumed. Wilson v. Owens Horse & Mule Co., 14 Ala. App. 467, 70 South. 956.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harrell v. Hooks.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published