Price v. State
Price v. State
88 So. 64; 17 Ala. App. 651; 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8
(Southern Reporter)
Price v. State
Opinion of the Court
The only insistence made by the defendant is that the court should have granted him a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to submit the question of guilt to the jury and to sustain the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.