1922
210 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1922.
- Bailey v. State 94 So. 923, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Martin v. City of Birmingham 94 So. 789, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Smith v. State 94 So. 927, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Douglas v. State 94 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Scott v. State 94 So. 785, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Price v. State 94 So. 785, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Moss v. State 96 So. 451, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Sherrell v. State 94 So. 781, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Marshall v. State 94 So. 926, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Mims v. State 94 So. 926, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Williams v. Ensley Motor Co. 94 So. 612, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Dunn v. State 94 So. 786, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Childs v. City of Birmingham 94 So. 790, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- State v. Lee 94 So. 839, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Bean v. State 94 So. 781, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Brooks 96 So. 81, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Fincher v. State 94 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Caffey v. Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co. 96 So. 454, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Overcast v. State 94 So. 926, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Day v. Galloway 96 So. 365, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Kelly v. State 94 So. 925, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- La Grave v. State 94 So. 925, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. Eubanks 94 So. 198, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Blackwood v. Blackwood 94 So. 182, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Coe v. City of Dothan. 94 So. 186, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Echols v. Snider 94 So. 189, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McEachern 94 So. 784, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- White v. Morring 95 So. 494, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- National Life & Accident Ins. v. Hanner 94 So. 259, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v. Hodges 94 So. 252, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- McCord v. Rumsey 95 So. 268, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- A. C. Scharnagel & Sons v. Britton 94 So. 201, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Philips v. Smith 94 So. 191, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. McLendon 94 So. 193, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- J. B. Colt Co. v. Channell 95 So. 209, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Denham v. Yancey 95 So. 201, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson & Ingalls Motor Car Co. 94 So. 194, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. Harris 94 So. 185, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Jones v. Cade 94 So. 255, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Steele By-Products Co. v. McGee Cowart 94 So. 268, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- State v. Kirkpatrick 95 So. 490, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Barnes v. City of Huntsville 94 So. 188, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Conecuh County v. Simmons 95 So. 488, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Irwin v. Morrow 95 So. 496, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Alabama Northern Ry. Co. v. Hoge 93 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Beard v. J. B. Colt Co. 94 So. 189, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Davis v. Stanley 94 So. 185, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- H. H. Daniel Co. v. Brown 94 So. 243, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- State v. Royle 93 So. 927, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
- Grissett v. State 94 So. 271, (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)