Catrett v. State
Catrett v. State
97 So. 124; 19 Ala. App. 311; 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 167
(Southern Reporter)
Catrett v. State
Opinion of the Court
The only exception reserved on the trial was to the court’s ruling in permitting the state’s witness Eloyd to testify that the beer found at the still was the “kind of beer of which they make rum.” This was a fact descriptive of the beer found at the still being operated, and was relevant.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.