Harris v. State
Harris v. State
99 So. 925; 19 Ala. App. 682
(Southern Reporter)
Harris v. State
Opinion of the Court
Defendant was convicted on
a charge of unlawfully possessing a still, and appeals. There are no exceptions of merit presented in this record. There was a question as to the sufficiency of the record, hut that has been corrected by a return to the certiorari issued by this court. The evidence was sufficient to convict. The jury so found. The record as corrected contains no prejudicial eryor. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.