The indictment contained two counts, one charging larceny and the other receiving stolen goods. The verdict of the jury is predicated on the second count. Whatever was taken at the time of the larceny is of the res gestse and is relevant to the issue.

A witness, if he knew, can testify as to the identity of a suit of clothes without giving any parii-ular identifying description. The probative íorce of sucb testimony is for the jury.

We have examined the entire record. There are no prejudicial errors, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.