Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925

Everett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided December 15, 1925 · Rice

106 So. 680; 21 Ala. App. 195; 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 329 (Southern Reporter)

Counsel

Ballard Brassell, of Troy, for appellant. Counsel argue for error in the rulings of the court, but without citing authorities. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robert G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. The affirmative charge was properly refused. Glaze v. State, 20 Ala. App. 7 , 100 So. 629 ; Patterson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 55 , 88 So. 360 .

Opinion of the Court

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by having in his possession a quantity of beer containing alcohol. Everything connected with his trial was regular and without error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict returned.

Charge 2, requested, by defendant, was properly refused. The purpose for which the mixture was placed in the barrel would not affect appellant’s guilt vel non of the offense charged.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.