Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925

Veal v. State

Veal v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided May 26, 1925 · Rice
105 So. 705; 21 Ala. App. 48 (Southern Reporter)

Counsel

Baldwin Murphy, of Andalusia, for appellant. There was no direct evidence of defendant's guilt, and requested charge 4 should have been given. Tatum v. State, 20 Ala. App. 24 , 100 So. 569 . Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State. No brief reached the Reporter.

Veal v. State

Opinion of the Court

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of distilling, etc., and appeals. This case has been here once before. Veal v. State, 19 Ala. App. 168, 95 So. 783.

Charge 4, refused to defendant, was, under the reasoning and rule laid down in Tatum v. State, 20 Ala. App. 24, 100 So. 569, the case he cites, misleading, and properly refused.

It appears that the defendant has had a fair trial, and we can find no prejudicial error in the record.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.