Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925

Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided November 3, 1925 · Samford
106 So. 53; 21 Ala. App. 159; 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 283 (Southern Reporter)

Counsel

Harwell G. Davis. Atty. Gen., and Robert G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. The rulings of the court on demurrer to the indictment were free from error. Gullatt v. State, 18 Ala. App. 21 , 88 So. 371 ; Fason v. State, 19 Ala. App. 533 , 98 So. 702 ; Thompson v. State, 19 Ala. App. 328 , 97 So. 258 ; Robinson v. State, 212 Ala. 459 , 102 So. 693 .

Robinson v. State

Opinion of the Court

*160 SAMFORD, J.

The case was tried on the first two counts of the indictment, to which demurrer was interposed. The statute is designed to prevent the treatment of diseases of human beings by any system whatever, without the party so engaged has first obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board of medical examiners of this state. The two counts sufficiently charge the offense and are not subject to the demurrers interposed. Wideman v. State, 20 Ala. App. 422, 104 So. 438; Ex parte Wideman, 213 Ala. 170, 104 So. 440.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.