1925
482 Alabama Court of Appeals opinions from 1925.
- Chatman v. City of Birmingham 104 So. 919, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Lynch v. City of Bessemer 104 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Robertson v. City of Edgewood 104 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Alabama Power Co. v. Scott 104 So. 873, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Scott v. State 104 So. 925, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Quisenberry v. Grant 104 So. 284, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Duffey v. State 104 So. 920, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Konedaris v. State 104 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Higdon v. State 104 So. 913, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Grissett v. State 104 So. 845, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Cusimano v. State 104 So. 920, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. Kent 104 So. 286, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Stewart v. State 104 So. 352, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Louisville N.R. Co. v. Bunnell 104 So. 344, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Moody v. State 104 So. 142, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co. v. Martin 105 So. 697, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Falkner v. City of Bessemer 106 So. 896, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney 104 So. 288, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Etheredge v. Tennessee Valley Bank 104 So. 288, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- C. M. McMahen & Sons v. Louisville & N. R. 106 So. 56, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Cook v. State 104 So. 837, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Potter v. State 104 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Cline v. State 104 So. 347, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Willis v. State 104 So. 141, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Smith v. McDougall 104 So. 143, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Griggs v. State 104 So. 921, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Weems v. State 104 So. 345, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Chaney v. Long 105 So. 719, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Lang v. Hall 104 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- McCutchen v. State 104 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Coburn 104 So. 346, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Poor 104 So. 343, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Louisville N.R. Co. v. Atkinson 104 So. 835, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Smith v. Lineville Nat. Bank 106 So. 54, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Sewell v. Richardson 104 So. 139, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Wallace v. American Wholesale Corp. 104 So. 776, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Konedaris v. State 104 So. 922, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Thrash v. Town of Eclectic 103 So. 926, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Barker v. State 103 So. 914, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Roseberry v. State 103 So. 901, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Ex Parte Gilbert 103 So. 924, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Conner v. State 104 So. 554, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Sammitt v. State 104 So. 925, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Alkahest Lyceum System v. Dauphin Way Baptist Church 103 So. 719, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Pitt v. State 104 So. 837, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- McColston v. State 104 So. 347, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Thomas 104 So. 559, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Parker v. White 104 So. 843, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Bugg v. Mitchell 103 So. 713, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Washington & C. Ry. Co. v. Stallworth 103 So. 603, (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)