Mitchell v. State
Mitchell v. State
107 So. 734; 21 Ala. App. 312; 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 91
(Southern Reporter)
Mitchell v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s counsel argues very ably and convincingly in brief that the evidence is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the indictment, but nowhere in the record is the question raised in 'such manner as calls fer a review of the court’s action in the matter.
The affirmative charge is not requested, nor is there an application for a new trial. The rulings of the court, as they appear in the record, are free from error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.