Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926

Arthur v. State

Arthur v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided February 16, 1926 · Bricken
107 So. 924; 21 Ala. App. 659 (Southern Reporter)

Arthur v. State

Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, P. J.

We have carefully examined all the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case, as shown by the record. It was totally insufficient to warrant, the conviction of this appellant, and in overruling the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence the court committed reversible error. Under the whole evidence, the defendant was entitled to his discharge. Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.