Arthur v. State
Arthur v. State
107 So. 924; 21 Ala. App. 659
(Southern Reporter)
Arthur v. State
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully examined all the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case, as shown by the record. It was totally insufficient to warrant, the conviction of this appellant, and in overruling the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence the court committed reversible error. Under the whole evidence, the defendant was entitled to his discharge. Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.