Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926

Alford v. State

Alford v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided November 30, 1926 · Rice
111 So. 606; 21 Ala. App. 652; 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 369 (Southern Reporter)

Alford v. State

Opinion of the Court

RICE, J.

There was a general verdict of guilty under an indictment containing counts charging distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and unlawfully being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited* liquors. On this appeal, prosecuted by the defendant from the judgment of conviction which followed, the bill of exceptions does not contain a recital that it contains all, or substantially all, of the evidence offered in the case. Any state of the evidence necessary will therefore be presumed, in order to uphold the rulings of the trial court as to evidence or charges requested. Terry v. State, 17 Ala. App. 527, 86 So. 127.

There being no error in the record, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.