Wolf v. State
Wolf v. State
111 So. 320; 21 Ala. App. 642; 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 218
(Southern Reporter)
Wolf v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of the offense of distilling prohibited liquors, etc.
Where it appears that there was a regular finding of guilt by the jury, followed by an appropriate sentence by the court, a proper adjudication of guilt will, upon appeal, be presumed.
All facts and circumstances constituting a part of the res gesta of the alleged offense are properly allowed to go in evidence.
Thefe is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.