The facts adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below presented a jury question. The court properly so held by refusing to defendant the general affirmative charge requested in writing.

Appellant was convicted for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. No erroneous ruling of the court appears, and under all the facts 'we will not disturb the action of the court in overruling motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.