King v. State
King v. State
129 So. 482; 23 Ala. App. 554; 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 163
(Southern Reporter)
King v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant complains ■ that the trial court erred in refusing to permit defendant to prove that another than defendant said he was the owner of the whisky found in defendant’s car. This would have been hearsay evidence.
There is! no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.