Peebles v. State
Peebles v. State
129 So. 308; 23 Ala. App. 568; 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174
(Southern Reporter)
Peebles v. State
Opinion of the Court
The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.