Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930

Peebles v. State

Peebles v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided June 24, 1930 · Samford
129 So. 308; 23 Ala. App. 568; 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174 (Southern Reporter)

Peebles v. State

Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, J.

The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.