Sutton v. State
Sutton v. State
131 So. 5; 24 Ala. App. 134; 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 286
(Southern Reporter)
Sutton v. State
Opinion of the Court
. The proceedings in this case, except as herein noted, appear regular in all respects, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
The sentence of the defendant, appellant, to “-days to pay the costs,” etc., is irregular, and cannot stand. Williams v. State, 23 Ala. App. 338, 125 So. 207.
The cause is remanded, for proper sentence as to costs.
Judgment of conviction affirmed; cause re'manded for proper sentence as to costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.