The only question we are called upon to decide is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction.

It would serve no useful purpose to discuss it.

Suffice to say, we have read and considered same, sitting en banc. Arid we are of the opinion, and hold, that it was ample in strength to serve 'as a basis for the finding of the trial court, who sat without a jury.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.