Wilson v. State
Wilson v. State
134 So. 927; 24 Ala. App. 699
(Southern Reporter)
Wilson v. State
Opinion of the Court
We have examined each exception reserved on the trial. There is no error prejudicial to the defendant’s rights in any of these rulings. The record presents a simple charge of burglary with circumstantial evidence connecting the defendant with its commission. The facts were properly submitted to a jury.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.