Rutland v. State
Rutland v. State
134 So. 457; 24 Ala. App. 276; 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 276
(Southern Reporter)
Rutland v. State
Opinion of the Court
It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that an exception was reserved to the action of the court in overruling defendant’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial. Where this is the case, said action will not be here reviewed.
We discover no prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed..
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.