Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934

Sales v. State

Sales v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 1934 · Rice
155 So. 923; 26 Ala. App. 683 (Southern Reporter)

Sales v. State

Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

It is sufficient, in disposing of this appeal, to say that the court has examined the proceedings, including the bill of exceptions, sitting en ban?;, and that it is our opinion that there is no testimony tending to show the violation of any law.

To the contrary, the state’s testimony shows that no law was violated. It should have been excluded upon appellant’s motion, duly made.

For the error committed in overruling said motion, the judgment of conviction is reversed ; and, it appearing as aforesaid herein, it is ordered that appellant be discharged.

Reversed and rendered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.