Alabama Court of Appeals, 1936

Trousdale v. Bedingfield

Trousdale v. Bedingfield
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided March 24, 1936 · Rice
167 So. 925; 27 Ala. App. 696 (Southern Reporter)

Trousdale v. Bedingfield

Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

We find no assignment of error argued and insisted upon in the way and manner outlined as requisite in our opinion in the case of Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Smalley, 26 Ala.App. 176, 156 So. 639.

What we said in. the above opinion seems to have had the approval of our Supreme Court. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Smalley, 229 Ala. 289, 156 So. 641.

Hence we must hold, and do hold, that there is nothing before us for review. And the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.