The indictment in this case contains two-counts. First, charged that the defendants, with two others, not here tried, did unlawfully manufacture whisky, and the second count charged the same parties with being in possession of a still.

The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty,, as charged in the indictment as against both ' defendants, and sentence was properly passed.

We have carefully read and considered the testimony in this case. There-were no prejudicial errors in the admission, of testimony, and there was sufficient evidence tending to prove the guilt of the-parties to justify the verdict.

Charge A refused to the defendants was amply covered in the court’s oral charge.

Charges C and D, being the affirmative charge as to each count, were prop-erly refused.

We find no error in the record and the: judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.