Nash v. State
Nash v. State
173 So. 269; 27 Ala. App. 392; 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
(Southern Reporter)
Nash v. State
Opinion of the Court
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the convictions, and for that reason the general charge as requested by the defendant was properly refused and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
The record is in all things regular and without error.
•The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.