Cunningham v. State
Cunningham v. State
195 So. 295; 29 Ala. App. 264; 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 170
(Southern Reporter)
Cunningham v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief here, in which he argues valiantly that the testimony adduced against this appellant was insufficient to support the verdict of guilt returned against him; also, that some hurt-ful errors were committed in the admission, over his objection, of certain bits of testimony.
But we do not find any bill of exceptions in the transcript; hence the questions raised, as above indicated, cannot be decided by us.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.