Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940

Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals · Decided February 27, 1940 · Rice
195 So. 295; 29 Ala. App. 264; 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 170 (Southern Reporter)

Cunningham v. State

Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief here, in which he argues valiantly that the testimony adduced against this appellant was insufficient to support the verdict of guilt returned against him; also, that some hurt-ful errors were committed in the admission, over his objection, of certain bits of testimony.

But we do not find any bill of exceptions in the transcript; hence the questions raised, as above indicated, cannot be decided by us.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.