Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 1971

Cassidy v. State

Cassidy v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided January 12, 1971 · Cates
46 Ala. App. 410; 243 So. 2d 393; 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 419

Cassidy v. State

Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

The record in this appeal omits any declaration of the organization of the court whence it comes. This appeal being thus abortive must, therefore, be dismissed.

The organization of the trial court must be shown at the beginning of the transcript for an appeal. A form for such showing is set forth in Supreme Court Rule 24.

The lack of such a declaration is jurisdictional and appellate courts take notice thereof ex mero motu. McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; Sparrow v. Evans, 275 Ala. 89, 152 So.2d 155; Wilson v. State, 275 Ala. 402, 155 So.2d 506; Tidwell v. State, 41 Ala.App. 296, 130 So.2d 206; Bunn v. State, 44 Ala.App. 68, 202 So.2d 176.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.