Racine v. State
Racine v. State
47 Ala. App. 33; 249 So. 2d 648; 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 459
Racine v. State
Opinion of the Court
Selling marijuana: sentence, five years.
The true bill omits the name of the buyer. Appellant in writing requested the affirmative charge with hypothesis as to Count One of the indictment. Hence, the trial court erred in refusing this requested charge. Duin v. State, 3 Div. 79, 47 Ala.App. 693, 260 So.2d 599 (Mar. 16, 1971).
In view of reversible error thus being shown, we have not examined any of the other points raised by appellant.
The judgment below is due to be reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.