Powers v. State
Powers v. State
Opinion of the Court
Possession of marihuana
The record is devoid of any colloquy between the judge and the defendant to show compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274.
On authority of Honeycutt v. State, 47 Ala.App. 640, 259 So.2d 846 and Walcott v. State, 288 Ala. 546, 263 So.2d 178, the judgment below must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
. Unlike the 1940 Code, T. 22, § 256, which employed the Castilian, “marijuana”, the Uniform Act uses the orthographic variant “marihuana”, perhaps an Anglieizaüon to avoid the consonantal “j” sound.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.