Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 1982

Kennedy v. State

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided January 26, 1982 · Bowen

409 So. 2d 1010; 1982 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2939 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Ex Parte Boatwright (Ala. 1985)
Graves v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)
Driver v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1984)
Glover v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)
Eason v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
Evans v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)
Whitson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
David v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
Mitchum v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
Trammell v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
Chapman v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
Kennedy v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Kennedy's petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied by the circuit court without an evidentiary hearing. The petition is meritorious on its face, Summers v. State,366 So.2d 336 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), cert. denied, 366 So.2d 346 (Ala. 1979), and states matters which, if true, authorize relief.Henry v. State, 387 So.2d 328 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980); Goodman v.State, 387 So.2d 861 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 387 So.2d 862 (Ala. 1979). The Attorney General fully recognizes and admits this principle on appeal.

The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the petition is reversed. This cause is remanded with directions that an evidentiary hearing be held at which the defendant is present and represented by counsel. We specifically note that the Attorney General has filed a motion requesting this very same action.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.