Adams v. BAY MINETTE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASS'N
Adams v. BAY MINETTE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASS'N
Opinion
This is an appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of plaintiff-appellee.
Bay Minette Production Credit Association filed suit on a promissory note executed by Offshore Trawlers, Inc. and appellant on January 30, 1980. The promissory note arose out of these facts: Bay Minette Production Credit Association arranged to make a shrimp boat loan to Offshore Trawlers, Inc. and Thomas C. Adams, III as co-maker. Under the provisions of
Appellant contends that the trial court committed error in refusing to require plaintiff to add Offshore Trawlers, Inc. as a defendant. Appellant cites Rule 19, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, in support of this contention. Rule 19 is inapplicable and this situation is governed by §
Appellant further contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Appellee-plaintiff filed affidavit of its president, Joe R. Newell, in support of its motion stating the existence of two *Page 151 loans (one for the shrimp boat and one for the Class B Stock), the default in the loans, payment of the shrimp boat loan by the United States Department of Commerce, the retirement of the stock towards liquidation of the other note and the balance due and unpaid. On the date of hearing on the motion, the appellant filed the counter-affidavit of Ethel M. Adams, Vice-President of Offshore Trawlers, Inc. and wife of appellant. Her affidavit admits that Thomas C. Adams, III "indorsed these notes," and at the time of the loan her husband signed a number of papers and appellee represented to him he would receive and become owner of shares of stock in the Association. The affidavit of Adams also stated that neither Offshore Trawlers, Inc. nor Thomas C. Adams, III ever received any stock, or money, certificate, dividends or voting rights in return for the note sued on. Hence, appellant apparently contends this affidavit raises a genuine issue of a material fact regarding the stock and/or lack of consideration.
The procedure under the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as to Class B Stock is ably stated in Loomis v. Blacklands ProductionCredit Association,
Under Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P., summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party has demonstrated by the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions and affidavits, that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to the requested relief as a matter of law.Campbell v. Alabama Power Company,
Appellant further contends that in view of § 7-8-314 (b), Ala. Code (1975), a genuine issue of a material fact is created. This code section applies to negotiable instruments, §
The record shows without contradiction that appellant borrowed from plaintiff all the money used by him for the purchase of his required Class B Stock. It further shows that after he became delinquent appellee redeemed the stock, at par value of $5 per share, and credited that amount to the principal of the appellant's note. The appellant does not negate the requirements of
There being no material issue of fact presented to the trial court, it was not error to grant summary judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge ROBERT M. PARKER while serving on active duty status as judge of this court under the provisions of §
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas C. Adams, III v. Bay Minette Production Credit Association.
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published