Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 1985

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided August 21, 1985 · Edward N. Scruggs
475 So. 2d 877 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Opinion

The plaintiffs' Rule 59, A.R.Civ.P., motion was overruled by operation of Rule 59.1, and more than forty-two days thereafter having expired before the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal and are left with no alternative but to dismiss it ex mero motu. Rule 2 (a)(1), A.R.A.P.; State v. Wall, 348 So.2d 482 (Ala. 1977);Haynes v. Haynes,470 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Olson v.Olson, 367 So.2d 504 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979).

The foregoing opinion was prepared by retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10 (e) of the Code of Alabama 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.