Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch, 475 So. 2d 877 (1985)
Edward N. Scruggs

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Opinion

The plaintiffs' Rule 59, A.R.Civ.P., motion was overruled by operation of Rule 59.1, and more than forty-two days thereafter having expired before the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal and are left with no alternative but to dismiss it ex mero motu. Rule 2 (a)(1), A.R.A.P.; State v. Wall, 348 So.2d 482 (Ala. 1977);Haynes v. Haynes,470 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Olson v.Olson, 367 So.2d 504 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979).

The foregoing opinion was prepared by retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10 (e) of the Code of Alabama 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Tri-State Auto Auction and Georgia Casualty and Surety Company v. Ronald Eugene Crouch, Ronald Eugene Crouch D/B/A Crouch Motors.
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published