Taylor v. State
Taylor v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief, wherein the petitioner challenges his 1988 guilty plea convictions for violating the Controlled Substances Act.
In his petition, the petitioner charges, among other things, that he was improperly *Page 1134
sentenced under Alabama's Habitual Felony Offender Act and not under the sentencing provisions of the Controlled Substances Act in violation of Ex parte Chambers,
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
All Judges concur.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief, wherein the petitioner challenges his 1988 guilty plea convictions for violating the Controlled Substances Act.
In his petition, the petitioner charges, among other things, that he was improper
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On remand, an evidentiary hearing was held. The trial court resentenced the petitioner in accordance with Ex parte Chambers, 522 So.2d 313 (Ala. 1987).
The order of the circuit court denying the petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
All Judges concur.
Addendum
On remand, an evidentiary hearing was held. The trial court resentenced the petitioner in accordance with Ex parteChambers,
The order of the circuit court denying the petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
All Judges concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.