Jordan v. State
Jordan v. State
Opinion
Calvin Jordan was indicted for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance in violation of §
Initially, Jordan contends that the trial court committed reversible error in the sentencing phase by basing Jordan's sentence upon Jordan's alleged sale of controlled substances in a prior case in which there *Page 1025 was no conviction. Secondly, Jordan contends that the indictment returned against him was returned by an unlawfully constituted grand jury and is therefore void.
It is axiomatic that to preserve an assignment of error for appellate review, the alleged error must first be presented to the trial court. Dossey v. State,
The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a retired Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Calvin Jordan v. State.
- Cited By
- 13 cases
- Status
- Published