Daughtry v. State
Daughtry v. State
Opinion
The appellant, Autry Delaine Daughtry, pleaded guilty to burglary in the third degree, a violation of §
On appeal, the appellant questions the trial court's application of the Habitual Felony Offender Act. Specifically, he argues *Page 1286 that the state presented no record of his prior convictions. The state argues that there is nothing in the record to indicate that the issue that the appellant raises concerning his being sentenced as a habitual offender has been preserved for purposes of appeal.
However, the record reflects that no court reporter was present either at the appellant's plea hearing or during his sentencing hearing. A defendant has a right to have a court reporter present to transcribe the proceedings. See Fair v.City of Birmingham,
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
All the Judges concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Autry Delaine Daughtry v. State.
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published