Smith v. State
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Darren Christopher Smith, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20 petition, A.R.Crim.P.Temp. (Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.). The appellant alleges in his petition that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilt, and that the trial judge erred in failing to recuse himself. A hearing was held on appellant’s petition; however, the court made no specific findings of fact. The state asks that this case be remanded to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County so that the court may make “specific findings of fact relating to
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.