Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 1993

Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg

Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided July 23, 1993 · Thigpen, Robertson, Yates
627 So. 2d 400; 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 349; 1993 WL 270891 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Universal Forest Products v. Ellenburg

Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

THIGPEN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part, and *401the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of April 16, 1993, 627 So.2d 398 (Ala. 1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed regarding its award of benefits to Ellenburg based on the finding of a 50% permanent partial disability.

AFFIRMED ON REMAND.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑