Norwood v. James River Corp.
Norwood v. James River Corp.
Opinion
Robert Norwood sued James River Corporation for workmen's compensation benefits. The trial court entered a judgment for James River, and Norwood appealed. We reverse and remand.
It is clear from the record that we must reverse, based on the trial court's failure to make any findings of fact or conclusions of law in this case, which involved evidence of a technical and, to a degree, complicated nature. Indeed, it is because of cases in which the evidence is technical and complicated, among other reasons, that §
The trial court made no such findings or conclusions. The only notation in the record regarding the trial court's decision is a statement entered on the case action summary sheet, to-wit: "Judgment by court for the defendant and against the plaintiff." Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Farris v. St. Vincent's Hospital,
The parties have informed this court that the distinguished trial judge who heard this cause has since retired from active service. If practicable, he should be given the opportunity to review the record in this case and to comply with §
Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for an order or proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The foregoing opinion was prepared by SAM A. BEATTY, Retired Justice, Supreme Court of Alabama, while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of §
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
All the Judges concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert Norwood v. James River Corporation.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published