Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995

Holland v. State

Holland v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided July 7, 1995 · McMillan
668 So. 2d 108; 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 240; 1995 WL 396662 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Holland v. State

Opinion of the Court

*109 On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

This cause was remanded to the trial court with instructions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing and determine whether the jury was placed under oath.

The trial court, having substantially complied with those instructions, has issued written findings of fact, stating that β€œan oath was administered to the prospective jurors prior to their voir dire examination in the case of State v. Douglas Fuqua, CC-93-113, which case was tried prior to the above-styled case.”

Because the oath was administered to the prospective jurors, no error occurred. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All judges concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.