Ex Parte Pruitt
Ex Parte Pruitt
Opinion
The petitioner, Renard Pruitt, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against the Honorable J. Richmond Pearson when the court refused to reinstate the $25,000 bond set at his preliminary hearing and raised the amount of his bond to $200,000. We denied the petition. Pruitt then petitioned to the Alabama Supreme Court. On May 3, 1995, the Alabama Supreme Court ordered us to remand the case to the circuit court so that an evidentiary hearing could be held. We remanded the case, and the trial court held a hearing and refused to reinstate the original amount of bond. We affirmed the denial of the petition on remand. State v. Pruitt,
Pursuant to the order issued by the Alabama Supreme Court this case is remanded to the Circuit Court for Jefferson County and that court is directed to make specific written findings explaining why it raised the petitioner's bail. It is further directed to file those findings in this court no later than 14 days from the date of this opinion.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.*
All the Judges concur.
On November 29, 1995, after a return was filed with the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for that court to remand to the circuit court "for entry of a written order setting out specific findings, pursuant to Rule 7.2, Ala.R.Crim.P., regarding the trial court's rationale for setting bail at $200,000" (no opinion).
Following the March 14, 1996, opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals, on May 9, 1996, entered the order "petition dismissed on motion of petitioner." The Supreme Court, on the same day, entered on its docket the entry "copy of order dismissing habeas corpus."
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ex Parte Renard Pruitt. (In Re State of Alabama v. Renard Pruitt).
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published