Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 1998

Garner v. Decatur Utilities

Garner v. Decatur Utilities
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided February 20, 1998 · Crawley
709 So. 2d 1309; 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 151; 1998 WL 68897 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Garner v. Decatur Utilities

Opinion

Leonard D. Garner sued Decatur Utilities, seeking workers' compensation benefits and alleging retaliatory discharge. Decatur Utilities filed a motion to dismiss the retaliatory discharge claim; the trial court granted that motion. Garner appeals from that dismissal. Because his workers' compensation claim remains pending in the trial court, we must dismiss the appeal.

An appeal ordinarily lies only from a final judgment. Ala. Code 1975, § 12-22-2; Bean v. Craig, 557 So.2d 1249, 1253 (Ala. 1990). A judgment is generally not final unless allclaims or the rights or liabilities of all parties have been decided. Ex parte Harris, 506 So.2d 1003, 1004 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987) (emphasis added). The only exception to this rule of finality is when the trial court directs the entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P. Bean, 557 So.2d at 1253. This appeal is from the dismissal of one of Garner's two claims. Because the other claim remains pending, this court cannot now reach the merits of this case.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.