Spencer v. Whitson
Spencer v. Whitson
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Bowers, 752 So.2d 1201 (Ala. 1999); Gresham v. Schlumberger Indus., Inc., 656 So.2d 347 (Ala. 1995); K.S. v. Carr, 618 So.2d 707 (Ala. 1993); and Johnson v. Martin, 423 So.2d 868 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982).
The appellees request for an attorney fee on appeal is denied.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because I believe the trial court erred by submitting to the jury the plaintiffs claim for damages for mental anguish, I dissent. Even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Whitson, I can find no evidence indicating that the conversion was attended with words or acts of insult
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.